« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Scan 23W  (Read 3382 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sqgator

  • Just Join!
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Audit Me! +0/-0
Re: Scan 23W
« Reply #30 on: December 24, 2006, 12:47:02 PM »
Thanks guys. I finally settled with full Scan set-up of 6000/12M/18W/23W. Should be up and running in a couple of weeks time.
Logged
" Once you are in the position of listening for flaws in the system, you are no longer listening to the music - certainly you hear the sounds, but if you are so interested in the reproduction you can no longer concentrate on the music itself. You may use test instruments to analyse the response, phase alignment, spectral decay and distortion of your system, but if, after all of that, it still sounds good - who cares? "

Offline wengweng

  • Senior ICER
  • Senior Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
  • Audit Me! +10/-8
Re: Scan 23W
« Reply #31 on: December 24, 2006, 02:14:30 PM »
Just curious, why not ring radiator tweeter ?

And also just curious, what is your HU and amps ?

Logged

Offline jeffreyocw

  • Just Join!
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Audit Me! +0/-0
Re: Scan 23W
« Reply #32 on: December 25, 2006, 12:13:07 AM »
Can anyone post some picture scan 23w sub with passive radiator??
very interesting....Thanks!! /92 /92
Logged

Offline sqgator

  • Just Join!
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Audit Me! +0/-0
Re: Scan 23W
« Reply #33 on: December 25, 2006, 09:45:30 AM »
Quote from: wengweng on December 24, 2006, 02:14:30 PM
Just curious, why not ring radiator tweeter ?

And also just curious, what is your HU and amps ?



2904/7100 or 7000 tweeters (actually I prefer 3004/6600) are just too big as my 12M will be on A-pillar too. And I read great comments on the 6000 from a few owners...but it's internet talks..I know..

HU: P90 combo
Amps: Audison LRx 2.4/4.5/1.1k

Logged
" Once you are in the position of listening for flaws in the system, you are no longer listening to the music - certainly you hear the sounds, but if you are so interested in the reproduction you can no longer concentrate on the music itself. You may use test instruments to analyse the response, phase alignment, spectral decay and distortion of your system, but if, after all of that, it still sounds good - who cares? "

Offline wengweng

  • Senior ICER
  • Senior Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
  • Audit Me! +10/-8
Re: Scan 23W
« Reply #34 on: December 25, 2006, 04:22:59 PM »
spgator, I am running the 600000 in my car now. IMO, it is one of the best small format tweeter money can buy.

But there are a few people running the 700000 here. I would say the 600000 is no match with the 700000, in all aspect (details, airyness, refineness, extensions etc). Every time I sat in their cars, I notice the difference. It is not that 600000 is not good. Its just that the 700000 is too good....
 
Anyhow, try it out first and see whether you are happy with 600000. Everybody has its own taste.

Welcome to the scanspeak club !  /134
Logged

Offline sqgator

  • Just Join!
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Audit Me! +0/-0
Re: Scan 23W
« Reply #35 on: December 26, 2006, 10:25:02 AM »
Wengweng, Any big difference between 7100 and 6000?
Logged
" Once you are in the position of listening for flaws in the system, you are no longer listening to the music - certainly you hear the sounds, but if you are so interested in the reproduction you can no longer concentrate on the music itself. You may use test instruments to analyse the response, phase alignment, spectral decay and distortion of your system, but if, after all of that, it still sounds good - who cares? "

Offline wengweng

  • Senior ICER
  • Senior Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
  • Audit Me! +10/-8
Re: Scan 23W
« Reply #36 on: December 26, 2006, 10:39:22 AM »
I think only louis' car is running the 7100 here. I would opt for 7100 over 6000 if space is not a problem. But if money if no object, I think I would get the 7000 instead. Its the last bit "Tiiiiing" extension from the triangle that separate the two great tweeter. As to whether it is worth it, that's to his own hehehehe

Try out the 6000 first lah, upgrading is part of the fun mah...
Logged

Offline aurie

  • Fanatic ICER
  • Senior Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 247
  • Audit Me! +7/-7
Re: Scan 23W
« Reply #37 on: December 26, 2006, 11:53:38 AM »
600000 still on my heart  /110  /92  /146

my ears not in that league to hear 700000... :P
Logged
ICELESS!!!

Offline netken

  • Newbie Icer!
  • Senior ICER!
  • True ICER
  • *
  • Posts: 379
  • Audit Me! +25/-22
  • Gender: Male
  • We Rise - You Fall.
    • ICE Hifi Fanatic!
Re: Scan 23W
« Reply #38 on: December 26, 2006, 12:44:49 PM »
if anyone wanna sell their 6000, i'm all ears ... hehehhehe....  /65 /65
Logged

Offline wengweng

  • Senior ICER
  • Senior Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
  • Audit Me! +10/-8
Re: Scan 23W
« Reply #39 on: December 27, 2006, 04:35:25 PM »
Quote from: jeffreyocw on December 25, 2006, 12:13:07 AM
Can anyone post some picture scan 23w sub with passive radiator??
very interesting....Thanks!! /92 /92

Jeff, I dont have my sifu temppei's sub picture leh. Its just like 2 subs in 1 normal box loh. As I know, there are 2 more cars changing to this sub with passive. Stay tune man.....
Logged

Offline jeffreyocw

  • Just Join!
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Audit Me! +0/-0
Re: Scan 23W
« Reply #40 on: December 27, 2006, 08:40:56 PM »
Quote from: wengweng on December 27, 2006, 04:35:25 PM
Jeff, I dont have my sifu temppei's sub picture leh. Its just like 2 subs in 1 normal box loh. As I know, there are 2 more cars changing to this sub with passive. Stay tune man.....

Thanks Bro Weng2
Then need to wait sifu Temppei post up picture liao.... /160 /160
Logged

Offline sqgator

  • Just Join!
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Audit Me! +0/-0
Re: Scan 23W
« Reply #41 on: January 06, 2007, 06:19:00 PM »
My 23W box is 0.6 cu.ft
Logged
" Once you are in the position of listening for flaws in the system, you are no longer listening to the music - certainly you hear the sounds, but if you are so interested in the reproduction you can no longer concentrate on the music itself. You may use test instruments to analyse the response, phase alignment, spectral decay and distortion of your system, but if, after all of that, it still sounds good - who cares? "
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Up
« previous next »