Author Topic: P80RS or CDA9887  (Read 3630 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline tenchi

  • Junior Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 79
  • Audit Me! +0/-2
P80RS or CDA9887
« on: August 21, 2007, 08:41:12 AM »
Hi all Sifus,
Among this two, which one is more suitable for SQ setting?
CDA 9887 is cheaper compare with P80RS...
Thank you

Offline Zenn

  • Thread Mods
  • Spam ICER
  • ***
  • Posts: 583
  • Audit Me! +22/-8
  • Gender: Male
    • Rosen's Homepage
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2007, 12:19:51 PM »
both also suitable, i think p80 slightly bit more features..

Offline netken

  • Newbie Icer!
  • Senior ICER!
  • True ICER
  • *
  • Posts: 379
  • Audit Me! +25/-22
  • Gender: Male
  • We Rise - You Fall.
    • ICE Hifi Fanatic!
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2007, 12:40:47 PM »
wats ur budget? kekekeke ....

Offline tkhpeng

  • Just Join!
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Audit Me! +1/-1
  • Gender: Male
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2007, 01:35:19 PM »
hehehe I also think of this 2 HUs I found that CDA9887 got 24bit D/A converter, sifu here to advise  /64

Offline Zenn

  • Thread Mods
  • Spam ICER
  • ***
  • Posts: 583
  • Audit Me! +22/-8
  • Gender: Male
    • Rosen's Homepage
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #4 on: August 21, 2007, 03:06:33 PM »
thats just like saying your car has fuel injection, but u are looking for car with best comfortable ride...

need to hear the SQ as a whole, not just 1 component.....even then still depends who made the chip and what model it is..

Offline jinhan

  • Senior ICER
  • Senior Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
  • Audit Me! +3/-1
  • Gender: Male
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #5 on: August 21, 2007, 03:27:58 PM »
hehehe I also think of this 2 HUs I found that CDA9887 got 24bit D/A converter, sifu here to advise  /64
P80 also got 24 bit dac

Offline tenchi

  • Junior Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 79
  • Audit Me! +0/-2
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2007, 04:24:39 PM »
i also looking forward to get P80RS coz its look more user friendly for me...

and i had listen to my fren car his p880rs sound good...but cda 9887 i never have chance to listen b4...

with rm1500 can get a p80rs or not?  /123

Offline built

  • Fanatic ICER
  • Spam ICER
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
  • Audit Me! +14/-16
  • Gender: Male
  • balance, i must find balance...
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #7 on: August 21, 2007, 06:57:33 PM »
new?
probably not from the authorized dealers.

with rm1500 can get a p80rs or not?  /123
built-2-last
Enjoy the music!
music is the only sensual pleasure without vice... - octave

Offline jinhan

  • Senior ICER
  • Senior Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
  • Audit Me! +3/-1
  • Gender: Male
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #8 on: August 21, 2007, 08:41:19 PM »
i got mine from mnkh, probably you should ask him.

Offline 9120

  • Just Join!
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Audit Me! +0/-0
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #9 on: September 14, 2007, 10:12:57 AM »
Hello jinhan, u got your P80 at RM1500 from mnkh? Local warranty set?
How can I contact mnkh? How about 9887?

Offline jinhan

  • Senior ICER
  • Senior Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
  • Audit Me! +3/-1
  • Gender: Male
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #10 on: September 14, 2007, 10:20:04 AM »
err not that price but higher. he will provide warranty. just pm mnkh27

Offline mnkh27

  • High-End Distributor
  • Audio Creations
  • Spam ICER
  • ***
  • Posts: 988
  • Audit Me! +41/-45
  • Gender: Male
  • Patience is a Virtue.
    • Audio Creations - No Games, Just Music
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #11 on: September 14, 2007, 10:51:47 AM »
err not that price but higher. he will provide warranty. just pm mnkh27


/144

Offline jinhan

  • Senior ICER
  • Senior Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
  • Audit Me! +3/-1
  • Gender: Male
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #12 on: September 14, 2007, 12:43:12 PM »

Offline 9120

  • Just Join!
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Audit Me! +0/-0
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #13 on: September 14, 2007, 02:24:00 PM »
Wah haha feeling so gay there hahaha....mnkh27 u got PM!  /62

Offline mnkh27

  • High-End Distributor
  • Audio Creations
  • Spam ICER
  • ***
  • Posts: 988
  • Audit Me! +41/-45
  • Gender: Male
  • Patience is a Virtue.
    • Audio Creations - No Games, Just Music
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #14 on: September 14, 2007, 03:27:59 PM »
Wah haha feeling so gay there hahaha....mnkh27 u got PM!  /62

 /134

Offline built

  • Fanatic ICER
  • Spam ICER
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
  • Audit Me! +14/-16
  • Gender: Male
  • balance, i must find balance...
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #15 on: September 14, 2007, 05:27:09 PM »
if you are same guy that asked this question in another forum,
here's a review from one individual i read on other forum. hope
you can decide better now.

by skylar112
So I've been using the 880PRS since early January this year with the iPod adaptor. I've gotten used to the unit, and the menu grew on me. However since having used the CDA9857's full speed iPod control I've been desiring better ipod controls. Anyway I've been patiently waiting for the CDA9887 to come out, so it finally goes. I got this unit today and I installed it earlier tonight. This is a review for the CDA9887 vs the DEH-P880PRS.

Fit, finish and installation:

Despite the the manual open face of the Alpine the fit and finish is better. When the 880prs was installed with the face closed I can wiggle the faceplate, and there would be some play in there. Which was a turn off. The Alpine fits tight, when the face is pushed closed, a nice audible click giving you that secure feeling. The face has absolutely no play. Also the face barely sticks out much because it has a thinner faceplate.
The ipod module for the Pioneer is rather annoying. Its a separate module that is about 4"x3" that you have to hide some where, and also provide power and ground for. The Alpine is just a acble that plugs straight into the back of the headunit. Thats an obvious choice there.
So the Alpine has the win in this department over the Pioneer.

Menus and options:
I've gotten rather used to the Pioneers menu so I might be a little biased. I've used many Alpines but getting aquainted with the 9887 makes my familiar knowledge of prior Alpines some what useless. I like how the 880 you can use the right wheel to scroll through. It makes it easy for me. Versus the different buttons you have to press to get to this menu, and some menus you have to press and hold. Its not quite so intuitive.
As far as options I prefer the Alpine hands down. I have to comment on the blackout feature on both. The blackout feature on the 880 is a joke, while the screen blacks out, the buttons are still brightly lit, renders the feature almost useless. The Alpine blacks out completely leaving a small red led on to the right side of the face which is barely noticable. I love the biolite display, I much prefer it over the eL display. Though the eL display isn't too shabby I just think the biolite is easier on the eyes and copes with reflections better. Feature for feature both are relatively the same. However the Alpine is bluetooth capable, HD radio ready, audyssey ready and a few other gimmicky features. But its not really fair to compare headunits that are about a year apart since technology can be vast in a years time. Also I want to add the sub volume only a push of a button away on the Alpine is much better versus having to go into the crossover menu to adjust the sub gains up and down on the Pioneer.
The Alpine has a slight edge due to the sub volume.

iPod control:
The biggest reason for me to leave Pioneer and into Alpine is the iPod control. A single $31.99 retail cable versus a $99.99? retail module. The Alpine is a simple plug and play. While the Pioneer you have to hide the module and also provide power and ground for it. The controls on both units are relatively the same. However the Alpine loads up much faster and offers more flexibility. There are 2 buttons on the faceplate that allows you to skip or go back to the previous playlists. Skipping playlists is a very nice touch. The Pioneer if I even wanted to scroll through the playlist to search for my next song it would take a few seconds just to load up the songs adjacent to the beginning of the search. Its rather frustrating and annoying. You would think that with a module that big speeds would be faster.

I give iPod controls to the Alpine for the simplicity of the plug and play cable, also the faster control and flexibility.

Rca outputs:

Not too much to say here except that the Alpine has much stronger outputs. I was rather surprised.

Advantage Alpine

Remotes:

I actually loved the Pioneers remote, its pretty intuitive and everything was accessible on the remote. The Alpine remote isn't worth the plastic its molded in. The buttons are stiff, you have to aim straight at the face, and you have to push the buttons hard. Sometimes Im pushing the buttons in, and nothing is happening when I'm aiming right at the radio. Absurd!

Hands down the Pioneer has a better remote.

Sound:
After adjusting to gains to match. Before I elaborate into the sound I want to describe the sound differences. The Pioneer has a warmer sound, versus the Alpine. Anyway both are good sounding headunits however even adjusting the gains to match the stronger outputs from the 9887 I still found that the 9887 had a more crisp sound. The piano sounds awesome and spacious. The acoustic guitar I can hear the guitarist finger strike against the string. I can almost picture how the finger plucks against the string as the sound resonates through the body of the guitar. Now I could hear all that on the 880 however not quite as effortless and enticing. The noise level is also noticibly lower on the 9887. And I have one of the 880s that didn't have a noise issue. I can just tell that when I listen to the alpine the noise level is to a minimum even when the gains on the amp were higher in the initial listening. The sub blends slightly better on the Alpine. My midbass response is snappier on the Alpine but had more extention on the Pioneer.

Advantage Alpine

Stage and imaging:

I haven't had tons of time on the 9887 but after everything is dialed it I notice slight but obvious enough differences. I had a dead center image from my Lotuses when I had the Pioneer on a bad day it wander slightly. And also the height of my stage was about 2-3 inches above my dash. Since the transition to the Alpine my center image is still there however it wanders some. It stays in the general area but it wanders in that area. And my stage height is now dash level.

Advantage Pioneer.

Eq, crossover and time alignment:

I prefer parametric eq over graphic. However the 16 band independent graphic eq on the Pioneer is nothing to sneeze at. It was very functional and more than enough for most. The independent L/R control is a great option. The Alpines 7 band graphic eq doesn't stand a chance. The 5 band p-eq on the Alpine is ok adjustable Qs, gains, and frequency. Nothing special. Though the P-eq is rather inflexible as mentioned by Mach y in his review. The inability to overlapp the frequencies of the P-eq in the Alpine is rather frustrating and annoying.
Time alignment is the same on both units. Though the Alpine allows you to use cm or inches. Nice touch. I prefer the display of the TA on the Pioneer better. Its more intuitive.
The crossover on the Pioneer took a while to get used to in the beginning menu wise. But when comparing the two side by side the Alpine allowed you to have independent L/R control of the crossover. And also the frequencies allowed are more flexible. And also as mentioned by many before allows the option of using a passive crossover, or an external active crossover to create a 3 way front stage.

Illumination:
I drive a VW my instrument cluster is blue, and my dash is amberish. The 880s bluish or white display is nice, but rather bright and obnoxious. Its hard to match anything out there. The Alpine has 5 display options. The amber option didn't match my dash perfectly but close enough for me not to complain. I will post up pictures of the display in amber for those who are curious.

Advantage Alpine

Eq: Pioneer hands down
TA: toss up
Crossover: Alpine hands down

disks used:

Steely Dan
Chesky Ultimate Demostration disk
Alpine F#1 disk
Various Telarc cds
Carlos Heredia
Fleetwood Mac

All in all I spend about 2.5 hours tonight to play with this radio. I think that I made a great choice and don't plan on looking back. I prefer the Alpine for many reasons. The SQ is more catered to my tastes, ipod controls are better for the impatient type, crossover allows room for growth, the stronger outputs leave less room for noise and the list goes on and on. Though the Pioneer has a nicer remote, better soundstage, etc. I still feel that overall package the Alpine is a better head unit for me. Hope this review helped.
built-2-last
Enjoy the music!
music is the only sensual pleasure without vice... - octave

Offline Zenn

  • Thread Mods
  • Spam ICER
  • ***
  • Posts: 583
  • Audit Me! +22/-8
  • Gender: Male
    • Rosen's Homepage
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #16 on: September 15, 2007, 12:25:34 PM »
excellent review...

Offline built

  • Fanatic ICER
  • Spam ICER
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
  • Audit Me! +14/-16
  • Gender: Male
  • balance, i must find balance...
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2007, 12:59:58 AM »
zenn,
tell mario to stop. princess is dying...
built-2-last
Enjoy the music!
music is the only sensual pleasure without vice... - octave

Offline Irr

  • Just Join!
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Audit Me! +1/-0
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #18 on: September 18, 2007, 02:02:36 PM »
built..what a good review..i'm using the 9887 now..as u mention it goes well with everything we need..check with one IASCA judge..he gave me 9/10 for soundstaging with this unit worr..marvellous

Offline built

  • Fanatic ICER
  • Spam ICER
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
  • Audit Me! +14/-16
  • Gender: Male
  • balance, i must find balance...
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #19 on: September 18, 2007, 07:45:24 PM »
the review is not not mine... cannot write so well la.
it's something i read in another forum.  /65
built-2-last
Enjoy the music!
music is the only sensual pleasure without vice... - octave

Offline Irr

  • Just Join!
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Audit Me! +1/-0
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #20 on: September 19, 2007, 11:22:14 AM »
oic..well..for me..i'm satisfy so far..waiting my sis to get the sound manager KTX-100eqx from US..then it much better lorr

Offline built

  • Fanatic ICER
  • Spam ICER
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
  • Audit Me! +14/-16
  • Gender: Male
  • balance, i must find balance...
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #21 on: September 19, 2007, 11:40:16 AM »
oic..well..for me..i'm satisfy so far..waiting my sis to get the sound manager KTX-100eqx from US..then it much better lorr

when the KTX-100eq arrive, please let me know, ya?
built-2-last
Enjoy the music!
music is the only sensual pleasure without vice... - octave

Offline Irr

  • Just Join!
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Audit Me! +1/-0
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #22 on: September 19, 2007, 11:45:01 AM »
heard from Wo Kee Hong..probably end of Oct..hmmm..price around rm1k-rm1.6k..better bought from US..US250x3.5=rm875..i think

Offline tenchi

  • Junior Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 79
  • Audit Me! +0/-2
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #23 on: September 20, 2007, 04:51:35 PM »
haha...i still havent decide yet...
but the 9887 is cheaper than p80...
so by the time i will see my dompet condition to pick the HU...

Offline kevyeoh

  • Senior ICER
  • True ICER
  • ***
  • Posts: 261
  • Audit Me! +3/-8
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #24 on: May 22, 2009, 02:57:38 PM »
sorry for digging up this old thread....

i would like to confirm if 9887 can control PXA-H701 processor?
means i no need to buy the RUX controller separately...

I check crutchfield website product description, seems like can...anyone can help confirm...that will be great...thx...

External Processor Controls: This unit can control an Alpine multi-channel sound processor, such as the PXA-H701 (item number 500PXAH701).

http://www.crutchfield.com/S-uh8ehpZY812/p_500CDA9887/Alpine-CDA-9887.html?tab=detailed_info

Offline andoropoi

  • Senior ICER
  • True ICER
  • ***
  • Posts: 253
  • Audit Me! +1/-0
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #25 on: May 22, 2009, 04:32:43 PM »
interesting thread kayveoh....im still undecided between these two......after many googling im settling with these two...but dunno which one to choose...

Offline ckmoy007

  • Senior Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
  • Audit Me! +1/-1
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #26 on: May 22, 2009, 09:15:16 PM »
sorry for digging up this old thread....

i would like to confirm if 9887 can control PXA-H701 processor?
means i no need to buy the RUX controller separately...

I check crutchfield website product description, seems like can...anyone can help confirm...that will be great...thx...

External Processor Controls: This unit can control an Alpine multi-channel sound processor, such as the PXA-H701 (item number 500PXAH701).

http://www.crutchfield.com/S-uh8ehpZY812/p_500CDA9887/Alpine-CDA-9887.html?tab=detailed_info
if i'm not mistaken, 9887 cannot control H701.

Offline kevyeoh

  • Senior ICER
  • True ICER
  • ***
  • Posts: 261
  • Audit Me! +3/-8
Re: P80RS or CDA9887
« Reply #27 on: May 23, 2009, 12:48:16 AM »
yea. After further reading seems like cannot control h701. The website typo i guess